Pathology Disclosure Bill Makes it Through House

A bill that would increase payment disclosure requirements for physicians who order laboratory tests and directly pay the lab for the tests was passed unanimously by the state House of Representatives. 

House Bill 2521 has been sent to the Senate Banking and Insurance Committee.

The Pennsylvania Medical Society (PAMED) was able to have the bill amended on the House floor so that it follows American Medical Association (AMA) and PAMED policy regarding pathology service disclosure.  

In Pennsylvania, physicians can either direct bill or client bill for pathology services.  

With direct billing, the provider or entity that provided or supervised the lab service directly receives payment.  

With client billing, the physician who ordered the lab service pays for the service and then collects payment from the patient or insurer. This allows the physician to, for instance, charge full price for the laboratory service even if they received a discount. 

AMA and PAMED policy calls for physicians who client bill to disclose the name of laboratory, the amount charged by the laboratory for each test, and the amount of the physician’s acquisitions or processing charge in bills to patients or insurers. 

Similar disclosures are required in a number of states, including neighboring Delaware, Ohio, Maryland, and New Jersey.

Add Your Comments


The Pennsylvania Medical Society encourages lively debate, but please behave courteously and responsibly. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks (including language that could potentially identify an individual), or any other inappropriate, offensive, or illegal material will be removed. For more information, please see our Terms of Use.

Display name as (optional):

Comments (max 2000 characters):




Comments: 1


Another attempt to legislate human behavior at the behest of the sanctimonious legal contingent - at home and in government. Of course, we can attest to the virtuosity of our legislators and their intents - but when do we actually address corruption in government; including generous federal pensions, benefits, privileges etc etc. State through municipal wastrel behavior. This is not a 'we-them; doctor-lawyer' contest. It IS a frustration with a system whose 'due process' ignores the subcontext of society's problems yet postures itself with multiple regulations oppressing the 'just' entrepreneur/ professional businessman while ignoring official waste and mismanagement - Oh Yeah! Politics as usual...Q.E.D.?

REINA at 7/22/2010 11:22:16 AM

Last Updated: 7/22/2010
From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: